Fort Hood Suspect's Vitriolic Statements Weigh Heavily

Steve Emerson puts together a revealing look at the depth of the Ft. Hood Jihad murderer Nidal Malik Hasan and several other Muslim Jihad attacks on Americans, in America.

FROM NEWSMAX.COM:

Fort Hood Suspect's Vitriolic Statements Weigh Heavily
Friday, November 6, 2009 3:22 PM

By: Steve Emerson


A picture of Nidal Malik Hasan is emerging from the slaughter he is accused of carrying out Thursday at a Fort Hood, Texas, readiness center, leaving 13 people dead and another 30 wounded.

The Army psychiatrist was chastised for proselytizing to his patients about Islam. Asked his nationality, he didn't identify himself as an American but as a Palestinian. Acquaintances said he appeared pleased about the shooting death of a Little Rock Army recruiter in June, and he reportedly was heard saying, "Maybe people should strap bombs on themselves and go to Times Square."
In the fateful moment before he opened fire on his unarmed victims, he shouted "Allah Akbar!"

With each new disclosure, some media outlets and organized Islamist groups increasingly are trying to deflect attention away from Hasan's religious motivation. In a statement condemning the attack, the Muslim American Society's Freedom Foundation referenced past shootings by soldiers on their bases and cited the suicide rate at Fort Hood.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued a statement once the killer's name was known condemning the attack and saying, "No religious or political ideology could ever justify or excuse such wanton and indiscriminate violence."

The condemnations are welcome and appropriate, if not the only thing that could be done in response to the tragedy. As we have noted previously, such unequivocal statements are much harder to come by when arrests are made before the killings can be carried out or when the killers share the Islamists' ideology.

Mary Rose Oakar, president of the Arab-American Anti Discrimination Committee, issued a statement calling the Hasan attack "absolutely deplorable." She also emphasized that the violence "has nothing to do with any religion, race, ethnicity, or national origin."
Friday morning, CAIR national spokesman Ibrahim Hooper told radio interviewer John Hockenberry that Hasan's motivation remains unknown: "He could have just snapped from some kind of stress. The thing is when these things happen and the guy's name is John Smith nobody says well what about his religious beliefs? But when it is a Muslim-sounding name, that automatically comes into it."

Contrast that with blogger Shahed Amanullah's willingness to address the matter with courage and honesty lacking among the American Muslim community's self-anointed national spokesmen: "Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, was reportedly troubled by his impending deployment to Iraq. Mental instability and depression has resulted in violence within the armed forces before. But unless Hasan left an explicit message to that effect, a religiously-inspired political act of violence is, much as we'd be unwilling to admit it, entirely plausible. With that in mind, Muslims will have to ask themselves some difficult questions as to why there are still those among us who continue to find justification for acts such as this in their faith."

Hasan's murderous rampage is just the latest in a string of attempts to murder American soldiers at home. It's a point Daniel Pipes made in 2003 after Hasan Akbar, a sergeant in the 101st Airborne Division, rolled a grenade into a tent holding his fellow soldiers on the eve of the invasion of Iraq. Akbar was found legally sane, convicted, and sentenced to death in 2005.

In June, Abdulhakim Muhammad killed an Army recruiter in Little Rock, Ark., and wounded a second recruiter. He told investigators he would have killed more people if he had seen them.

Fortunately, law enforcement broke up other plots before anyone got hurt. But in those cases, the Islamist organizations have cast the FBI as engaging in a sinister effort to entrap people otherwise uninterested in violence or incapable of carrying it out.
Among the examples:

Fort Dix — On May 7, 2007, six individuals were arrested for plotting an attack on the Fort Dix military base in New Jersey. The goal was to "kill as many soldiers as possible," according to court documents. Following a jury trial, the plotters were found guilty on charges of conspiracy to harm U.S. military personnel on Dec. 22, 2008. CAIR initially was supportive following the arrests saying, "We applaud the FBI for its efforts and repeat the American Muslim community's condemnation and repudiation of all those who would plan or carry out acts of terror while falsely claiming their actions have religious justification."

Later, CAIR also requested that media outlets and public officials refrain from linking this case to the faith of Islam. The council asked mosques and Islamic institutions in New Jersey and nationwide to report any incidents of anti-Muslim backlash.

Bronx Terror Plot — On May 20, 2009, James Cromitie and three others were arrested and indicted on charges arising from a plot to detonate explosives near a synagogue in the Bronx and to shoot down military planes at the New York Air National Guard Base at Stewart Airport in Newburgh. Although the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) initially condemned the plotters and congratulated the FBI on its efforts, it came to question the FBI's motives and methods, saying that "none of these cases that we're talking about now involved in al-Qaida cells. These were individuals who were either petty criminals or gullible people who were guilty of stupidity. They were not imminent threats to our country, as the FBI has stated."

North Carolina Jihad — On July 27, 2009, Daniel Patrick Boyd and six others were indicted in North Carolina for planning to "advance violent jihad including supporting and participating in terrorist activities abroad and committing acts of murder, kidnapping, or maiming persons abroad," after three years of being under FBI surveillance. Among the allegations was that Boyd and his co-conspirators intended to attack the Quantico Marine base. Because a member of Boyd's group cooperated with law enforcement, MPAC insinuated that the FBI improperly investigated the case: "The arrests come at a time when questions have been raised about the use of FBI informants in mosques and tense relations between law enforcement and local communities."
The same pattern has been applied in the past two weeks, since FBI agents shot and killed a Detroit imam who fired first. Luqman Abdullah had a long history of advocating an offensive jihad and using his mosque for training in martial arts and with weapons. Yet CAIR and other Islamist groups have argued his religious justifications should not be a part of the case and allege the FBI reacted with excessive force after Abdullah fired his weapon.

There's obviously a lot more to Hasan's attack still to be learned. He reportedly dreaded his pending deployment to Iraq and may have snapped. But to dismiss his statements about people "strap[ping] bombs on themselves" or that Muslims should rise up and fight the aggressors is irresponsible and counterproductive.

This is no isolated incident, and the sooner national groups face that fact, the sooner they might heed Amanullah's challenge to engage in a genuine search for the causes and confront those who help foster such violent ideology