Terrorist suspects must stay in Britain in case they are tortured at home, say human rights judges

It looks like British citizens are being victimize twice, first by Islamic terrorists bent on the destruction of Britain and secondly by the European Court of Human Rights. The obvious solution as to what to do with these animals is to ship them to Brussels in chains and release them in the European Court of Human Rights. Each and every one of them.

This should be a lesson for America to avoid the North American Treaty like the plague. The unintended consequences will be at least as bad as those nations subjecting themselves to EU rules.

Notice the red spot on this fellows forehead, that's the result of banging his head repeatedly into the floor during "prayers" at a mosque. This is a mark of distinction for Islamist terrorists. Pounding one's head into the floor pretty much sums up the intellectual level of Islamists.

FROM THE DAILYMAIL.CO.UK:

Terrorist suspects must stay in Britain in case they are tortured at home, say human rights judges
By JAMES SLACK
Last updated at 10:20am on 29th February 2008

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled hate preachers such as Abu Qatada should stay in the UK
Britain could be stuck with more than a dozen international terror suspects after a devastating ruling by the European Court of Human Rights.
Judges said the right of a fanatic to be protected from torture in his homeland was "absolute".
They rejected arguments that, in trying to deport an extremist to a country with a history of torture, the rights of British citizens to be protected from attack in their homeland should be considered, too.
The court also cast doubt on agreements Britain has been trying to secure with countries in the Middle East to allow the deportation of the likes of hate preacher Abu Qatada, known as Osama bin Laden's ambassador in Europe.
The Strasbourg judges said guarantees from countries such as Tunisia and Jordan they would not torture any terror suspect deported by the UK may not be acceptable.
The blow came in a ruling against an attempt by the Italian government to deport a terror suspect to Tunisia.
Britain had "intervened" on the crucial case, in an effort to establish it could deport more than a dozen terror suspects being held in secure jails.
The court described as "misconceived" the UK and Italian arguments that the risk to a terror suspect should be balanced against the risk they pose to innocent civilians.
Judges instead said the terror suspect had an "absolute" right to protection from torture - and this must come first.
It effectively upheld an earlier judgement blamed by ministers for our woeful failure to deport extremists.
They also cast grave doubt over the future of legal assurances given by countries with poor human rights records that they will not torture any suspect who is returned.
These so-called Memorandums of Understanding - including one which allows Qatada to be sent back to Jordan - could now be ripped up when they are challenged in Europe by suspects fighting deportation.
The first case is likely to be that of Qatada, who judges have labelled a "truly dangerous individual".
He called on British Muslims to martyr themselves in a war on oppression.
A Home Office spokesman said: "We intervened because terrorism undermines fundamental human rights - including the right to life. The Government is disappointed."
It came as the UK's most senior counter terrorism officer, Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, stood down yesterday, saying that the struggle against violent extremism is far from over.