Acquittal for Man with Loot in his Pocket

Here's a perfect example of Muslim ingratitude. As a matter of fact, it's a classic example of Islamic contempt for anything not Muslim.

The other issue here, and perhaps more important issue is the judge's complete disregard for the defendant's history of convictions, perjury, and an eyewitness description and identification. Such travesties can only happen in a morally bankrupt society and/or one that has accepted dhimmitude. Make's you wonder what the judge was "thinking" or perhaps this judge is the product of way too much liberalism, pot, and psychedelic mushrooms in his youth.


FROM NISNEWS.NL:

Acquittal for Man with Loot in his Pocket

THE HAGUE, 11/03/08 - A district court in Rotterdam has acquitted a 20 year old Somali of a mugging. Although the police found his loot in his pocket, the judge wanted to see more evidence.
The victim said he was threatened by the Somali, who told him he had a revolver aimed at his back. He received a blow on his head and was forced to surrender his wallet. When the police arrived they found the wallet in the Somali's jacket pocket. The Public Prosecutor (OM) considered robbery proven, but ran up against the judge, who wanted to see further evidence.
The judge was unmoved by the OM's argument that the victim had given a very detailed statement and the fact that the Somali had been convicted of mugging earlier, Additionally the suspect lied in more than one court case in the past, the OM argued in vain.
"One must certainly have guts to immediately mug someone again after just having served a prison sentence of some months. One must also assume that the defendant has learned something from the sentence and that it has made him wiser," according to the judge, who ordered the man's release.
The Somali showed that this was not enough for him. He was kept in custody for two months despite, he claims, being innocent and will demand damages from the man who accused him.