Walter Williams shows exactly why it is foolish to believe that because most Muslims are "peaceful" we should not eradicate the violent radical elements in Islam.

FROM FRONTPAGEMAG.COM:

Peace-loving?

By Walter Williams

The Washington Times | 3/25/2008
We all should give some serious thought to some of the ideas in an article circulating the blogsphere titled "Why a peaceful majority is irrelevant." So often our political leaders, "experts" and talking heads tell us Islam is a peaceful religion and most Muslims are not out to destroy the West. We're told only 1 percent, out of 1.2 billion Muslims, are fanatical jihadists who believe America is the Great Satan, cause of all evil, and should be attacked and destroyed.
In terms of national policy, it's irrelevant whether Islam is a peaceful religion and most Muslims are peaceful.
Think back to the 1930s when the Japanese murdered an estimated 3 million to 10 million people in China, Indonesia, Korea, Philippines and Indochina; and on December 7, 1941, when they attacked Pearl Harbor, killing more than 2,400 Americans. I'm betting most of Japan's then-60 million population were peace-loving people and would have wanted nothing to do with the brutal slaughter in China and the attack on the United States.
In formulating our response to the attack, should President Roosevelt have taken into account the fact that most Japanese are peace-loving people ruled by fanatics? Should our military have only gone after the Japanese pilots and their naval armada?
I would also wager that most Germans were peace-loving people and not part of the Nazi sadists wanting to wage war on their neighbors and exterminate the Jews. Again, should Roosevelt and Winston Churchill have taken that into account in their response to German militarism? My answer is no and thank God it was their answer too. Whether most Germans, Italians or Japanese were peace-loving or not was entirely irrelevant in formulating the Allied response to their militarism.
Horrible acts can be committed in countries where most of the people are peace-loving and simply want to be left alone to attend to their affairs. I imagine that described most of the people in the former Soviet Union. However, that did not stop the killing of an estimated 62 million people between 1917 and 1987.
The same can be said of the Chinese people, but it didn't stop the killing of 35 million of their countrymen during MaoTse-tung's reign.
Whether most people of a country are peace-loving or not is not nearly as important as who is calling the shots.
At this particular time, fanatical jihadists are calling the terrorism shots in many Muslim countries. Their success in committing terrorist acts is in no small part the result of the actions by the millions of peace-loving fellow Muslims.
First, there is not enough condemnation of their terrorist acts by the Muslim community. More important is the direct or indirect assistance terrorists receive through the silence of their fellow Muslims. There is no way terrorists can carry on their operations, obtain explosive materials, run terrorist training camps, raise money without the knowledge of other Muslims, whether they're government officials, bankers, family members, friends or neighbors.
Because those millions of peace-loving Muslims do not speak out and expose terrorists and don't more fully cooperate with domestic and international authorities trying to stop terrorists, they become enemies of the West just as the peace-loving people in Germany, Italy and Japan became enemies of the Allied powers during World War II. Like them, Muslims should be prepared to suffer the full might of the West in its efforts to fight terrorism.
I'm hoping the millions of peaceful Muslims take the proper action to avoid such an outcome. I'm not that optimistic. We're involved in a clash with a culture that has little regard for Western values that hold the sanctity of human life and liberty dear.