Muslim attorney in the Netherlands refuses to rise when judge enters

He won't stand for Dutch law

This is obviously an Islamic test of the Dutch judicial system and the Netherlands in general. If this ungrateful miscreant is allowed to set the precedent of not rising for the entrance of a judge in a courtroom, the West will have lost another round to the Global Jihad. Hopefully some judge will place him in jail for contempt of the court.

Where will you be when the Jihad hits the street?

FROM JIHADWATCH.ORG:

Muslim attorney in the Netherlands refuses to rise when judge enters

Mohammed Enaït refuses to rise for Dutch judges -- a clear indication that he does not respect them, or the system of law they represent. He respects only the law he considers to be divine law, the Sharia, and is no doubt working to bring about its triumph.
"Muslim attorney refuses to rise for judges," a translation of this Dutch article, with bracketed comments in bold from the Dutch Freedom Blog,March 3:

THE HAGUE - Mohammed Enaït, the ’sitting attorney’ still refuses to rise for the court when it comes in session. He will continue to do so even if he were to be reprimanded by the Council of Discipline. He is prepared to continue litigating up to the European Court of Human Rights. [oooooh......]

This, at least, is what the lawyer from Rotterdam told the Council of Discipline, the Dutch Order of Advocates’ internal court. It is common practice to rise for the court when the judges enter the Chamber as a sign of respect [respect for the rule of law in the Kingdom of the Netherlands actually] . Because Enaït refuses to do so [why? Doesn`t he respect the rule of law?] , the dean of the Order of Advocates started disciplinary proceedings against him six months ago. [good!]
Enait is an orthodox muslim [No, really?] and says he does not rise for a judge for religious reasons. [showing disrespect for the rule of law ... for religious reasons!]. According to the novice lawyer [he's actually a trainee attorney. My question is who the heck offers a pupillage to a wingnut of this stature?] the complaint was lodged solely because of religious reasons and white colleagues are never approached about similar complaints. [ehr... are there any examples of 'white' attorneys - or black ones for that matter that refuse to rise for the court? No? I didn`t think so.]

The dean, W.H. Claassen, emphasized that this case is about general rules of behaviour in a court of law and that this case is not about human rights issues, religion or freedom of expression. [if you want freedom of expression, try a less offensive way] The Council of Discipline will rule on this matter May 4 next.
[I can`t wait]