Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Whose side are they on?

Referring to the Obama administration Frank Gaffney is being extremely polite and civil with his question: "Whose side are they on?"  My take is that Barack Barry Soetoro Hussein Obama is a closet Muslim using the tools of Socialism to weaken America and allow Islamic fundamentalism to ultimately impose Sharia law on the country.  Obama's political allies are naive enough to believe that he only wants to impose Socialism and so are his willing useful idiots.  Little do they know that if Sharia is imposed, they will be among the first to have to accept Islam or live as dhimmis. 


Whose side are they on?
By Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

An unsettling question has begun to nag as Team Obama's conduct of security policy becomes ever more inconsistent with common sense - and, at least in some cases, manifestly at odds with our national interests: Whose side are they on?

Consider the following illustrative examples of such troubling behavior:

The Obama administration has done everything possible to obscure the true nature of the jihadist attack perpetrated at Fort Hood, Texas earlier this month. Unfortunately, it may not be merely complicating the prosecution of the alleged perpetrator, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. For instance, terrorism expert Steve Emerson has warned that, by charging Hasan only with murder rather than terrorist acts, the Justice Department is denying investigators tools available to law enforcement under the counter-terrorism Patriot Act.

Worse yet, by denying the role played in this attack by Hasan's adherence to the seditious, jihadist program authoritative Islam calls "Shariah," the administration can only compound the problem that has been illuminated by the investigation to date: The collective refusal of the Army, the intelligence services, the FBI and the U.S. government more generally to act against an individual with such proclivities.

This refusal goes beyond "political correctness." It reflects more than an understandable reluctance to risk the retribution to careers and livelihoods associated with being labeled "racists," "bigots" and "Islamophobes." It amounts, as a practical matter, to submission to the dictates of Shariah. And Americans are understandably horrified by the extent to which this practice has been -and is - affecting the capacities of those responsible for keeping us safe.