Unintended Consequences

Thanks to Atlasshrugs, one of the priceless sources in the fight against the Jihad.

Look at this now. An absolutely chilling and accurate scenario of how a terrorist attack could be perpetrated.

Unintended Consequences
FROM DIRECTORBLUE:

Then look at this article which points out the vulnerabilities of commercial nuclear materials used in medical and industrial roles.

Seize the Cesium
FROM NYTIMES.COM:

By PETER D. ZIMMERMAN, JAMES M. ACTON and M. BROOKE ROGERS Published: August 1, 2007
London
THE death of Alexander Litvinenko, the former K.G.B. officer who drank polonium-210 in a cup of tea, underscored the damage that radiological terrorists could do. The most familiar possible situations involve the detonation of a dirty bomb, a modest amount of high explosive mated to a container of radioactive material. But radioactive material inside the human body is far more dangerous than a dirty bomb.
Most analysts believe that about 10 people would die from radiation poisoning after a dirty bomb attack. Others believe that the only people likely to receive a lethal dose of radiation from a dirty bomb would already be dead from the blast. A perfectly feasible terrorist attack using the ingestion, inhalation or immersion of radioactive material, on the other hand, would be almost certain to kill hundreds. We call attacks of these kinds I-cubed attacks (for ingestion, inhalation and immersion). Such attacks can be sneaky, unaccompanied by a flash and bang.
READ IT ALL: